|
|
|
Goldman's Critical Support - Winter 2001 Sniffing Out
Unrecorded Income Both
divorce and bankruptcy situations often lead to charges of misappropriated
income. The methods used to hide income include not recording cash receipts
(getting paid under the table), bartering, diverting income to another entity,
overstating costs and expenses, paying expenses of another entity, and deferring
income to a later time period. Detecting these tricks requires applying both
experience and knowledge in a creative fashion, and being alert to transactions
and happenings (or the lack thereof) in the context of their expected setting.
Suspicion, inquisitiveness, and a willingness to dig beyond what is presented to
you are critical in finding unreported income. The
first step in an unrecorded income investigation is gathering the facts. If the
target is an individual, these facts would include:
For
businesses, the list of facts to gather would be similar to those listed above,
and would include additional items such as budgets and forecasts, business
plans, accounting detail (general and subsidiary ledgers), inventory worksheets,
promotional materials, price lists, material lists, list of significant
customers and vendors, etc. It is also useful to gather information such as trade
associations the company belongs to, industry statistics, standards and key
ratios, etc., to be able to form expectations of what should and shouldn’t be
found in the company’s accounts. A
thorough understanding of the target company’s business, system of accounting,
and internal controls will help you evaluate the information you obtained. You
should be able to answer the following questions: ·
Are cash
or barter transactions typical in this kind of business? ·
Are there
controls in place to ensure that all transactions are recorded? ·
What
types of activities are most likely to be unrecorded? ·
Where are
erroneous items most likely to be recorded (for example, cost overstatements or
personal expenses run through the business)? One
method used to determine net income is the net-worth method, which was first
successfully used in the tax fraud case of Al Capone. The investigator adds up
all assets and subtracts all liabilities of the subject to calculate net worth.
Changes in net worth from one period to another must equal the subject’s net
income. A danger in using this method is that (a) the initial or base net worth
figure may be understated due to hidden assets, or (b) subsequently obtained
assets may not be visible to the investigator. A
variation of the net worth method is showing that the subject being investigated
spent more money than can be accounted for by his available assets and income.
Review the subject’s standard of living – expenditures for mortgage and car
payments, education, grocery, entertainment, travel, clothing, domestic help,
etc. Even in today’s society where most consumers are overextended in debt,
the money had to come from somewhere, and if that somewhere is not identifiable,
then there must be unrecorded income. Another
common investigative practice for a business is to compare operating statistics
to (a) industry averages and (b) trends over time. For example, a company paying
an average of 30% of its revenues out as commissions, when the industry average
is 10% and the variance from the average tends to be minimal, may be either
overstating its commission expense or understating its revenue. When a business
that has consistently made a 40% gross margin for years all of a sudden slides
to a 20% margin, it may be experiencing operating problems, or somebody may be
skimming income out of the company. After
reviewing the big picture, the investigator will often find indicators of hidden
income, and tips on where to look for it, buried in the accounting detail. Some
common sources of leads include:
To
determine the value of a business or the factors behind a bankruptcy, or to
propose a divorce settlement, you have to know all of the economic income
involved. Money almost always leaves some kind of trail, and cases where it
doesn’t are so rare that the absence of a trial becomes a primary clue.
Curiosity, experience, and an understanding of the subjects involved often lead
to those trails and the rewards that lie at their ends. © Michael Goldman 2001 For more information, please go to www.michaelgoldman.com Editorial material in these newsletters is intended to be informative, and should not be construed as advice. For advice on any specific matter, please consult your financial or legal adviser. |
Send mail to
michaelgoldman@mindspring.com with
questions or comments about this web site.
|