|
|
Goldman's Critical Support - Fall 2000Which
Debtor Companies Will Emerge From Bankruptcy
Viability
depends largely on whether management accepts responsibility for its problems or
blames external circumstances. Debtor attorneys are usually brought into a case prior to a bankruptcy filing, and are part of the decision making process as to whether bankruptcy is the right option. Creditor attorneys generally come in after commencement of a case, and are relied upon to assist in determining whether the debtor is viable and if the creditors should assist in reorganization or pursue liquidation. Both debtor and creditor attorneys need to answer the
question, "Can this debtor be turned around?" The answer depends
largely on two factors: · whether management understands the true origins of the problems they need to solve, and ·
whether they have a realistic action plan for overcoming their
operating problems -- a plan that says who is responsible for each step, how
success will be measured, and when significant milestones in the corrective
action will be reached. The decline Businesses do not generally become financially troubled
overnight. Many managers blame a cataclysmic event such as bad weather, actions
of a competitor, computer system problems, a depressed local economy, or a rogue
employee -- but usually the problems that cause financial distress are
cumulative and have been building under the surface for a long time. Unfortunately, because most of the warning signs of
impending business failure are ignored as minor operating problems, early
remedial action is not taken, and management is later shocked at the
“sudden” insolvency or inability to operate. Failure to understand the
symptoms and their causes can make a successful turnaround, whether in or
outside of bankruptcy, highly unlikely. Management that refuses to accept this
reality will be unable to successfully emerge from bankruptcy. You will often hear failed business owners proclaim that
“everything was going great, we just ran out of money, and all we need is
another round of financing to make us successful." When was the last time
you heard someone say “I ran out of ability,” or, “I had a mismatch
between my operating strategy and my financing strategy,” or, “I failed to
generate enough quality sales”? It
is usually left up to the outside professionals to determine the root causes of
the problems and whether they are fixable. Fixability often depends on how far
along the company is in its decline. Stage 1: warning
signs The early stages of trouble usually include falling cash
balances (but only sporadic shortages), isolated operating bottlenecks, eroding
margins, stagnating or declining sales, rising inventory, and slower bill
payment. Corrective action at this stage can fix most problems relatively
easily. Unfortunately, management
is not typically concerned at this stage, as it often believes that the problems
are temporary or due to isolated external shocks. Stage 2: disruptions If ignored, these problems become more acute. Operating
problems mount as shortages disrupt normal business flow. Receivables
collections slow as customers become more concerned. Margins continue to erode,
cash balances become dangerously low, and meeting payroll becomes a challenge.
Lenders will start becoming concerned at this point, and meetings with lenders
consume growing quantities of management’s time. Morale falls, and good
employees start leaving the company. If allowed to progress too far, the
“vicious circle” starts feeding upon itself at increasing rates. At this
point the company is still fixable, but the prognosis is rapidly becoming more
in doubt. Stage 3: crisis
management As the decline continues, everything is in chaos. Chronic
material shortages and customer emergencies disrupt operations on a near
continual basis. Receivable collections have dropped dramatically, and most
material purchases are on a cash-on-delivery or cash-in-advance basis. Financial
management is spending virtually all of its time trying to satisfy the
creditors, and internal management reporting becomes sporadic and inaccurate.
Both customers and employees are leaving the company, and management is totally
focused on reacting to each moment’s crisis, which makes it nearly impossible
to implement any meaningful corrective actions. If outside professionals are not
brought into the case until this point, the company may already be too far gone.
A strong and convincing case must be made to the remaining employees, suppliers,
and customers to keep them all interested in supporting a turnaround, but
management may have lost its credibility with all of these groups by this point. Bad luck or
ineffective management? While almost every manager in troubled circumstances
believes that he or she got there due to an unusual run of bad luck, there are
almost always more common causes. These include lack of planning or budgeting,
poor reporting systems (it is hard to get somewhere else if you can’t
determine where you are), and over-dependence on key employees, key customers,
or key suppliers. Other potential problem causers include ineffective incentives
for employee retention, lack of product innovation, and failure to penetrate key
markets. The two most cited causes of failure, excessive leverage
and under-capitalization, are usually the result of a mismatch between financing
strategy and operating strategy. Unless management has realistic action plans
for these problems, there is usually little chance for the company to redeem
itself. Some will survive,
some won't It is critical for management to acknowledge that its
troubles are related to basic business management. Despite their protests that
the company got into trouble due to coincidental exogenous shocks, there are
very few businesses that fail for unique reasons. Good management knows that the
best ways to avoid trouble are to establish good budgets and monitoring systems
and then quickly respond to whatever divergences are found; listen to your
employees, customers, and vendors; deal with the problems and not their
symptoms; stay calm and focused; and realize that more capital is almost never
the answer. Managers that are focusing on getting more cash to throw
into the holes rather than stabilizing the existing cash flows, and who have
developed long-range plans to attract new investors rather than a short-term
business plan that outlines the steps necessary to strengthen or support the
core business, do not understand the critical issues and will not survive, even
under protection of the bankruptcy code. © Michael Goldman 2000 For more information, please go to www.michaelgoldman.com Editorial material in these newsletters is intended to be informative, and should not be construed as advice. For advice on any specific matter, please consult your financial or legal adviser.
|
Send mail to
michaelgoldman@mindspring.com with
questions or comments about this web site.
|